common-lisp/sbcl.sbcl
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of git://git.code.sf.net/p/sbcl/sbcl synced 2026-09-10 07:26:40 -04:00
Code Issues Actions 8 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Add FIXME

Browse source 
I'm not sure which test to blame: sb-posix.impure for being too sensitive
or run-sbcl.test.sh for changing the source tree.
I kinda feel that affecting the tree is the greater sin but I could also
see an argument that the DIRECTORY test needs better isolation.
This commit is contained in:
Douglas Katzman 2023-11-07 15:04:44 -05:00
parent c0909103ae
commit a3e29ded44
1 changed files with 4 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
tests/subr.sh
View file

@ -157,6 +157,10 @@ use_test_subdirectory () { # not a "subdirectory" now, but don't feel like renam
trap "cleanup_test_subdirectory" EXIT
}
# FIXME: Is it really true that a test must alter the source tree? How pathetic.
# In particular, failures can occur in the :READDIR/DIRENT-NAME test of sb-posix
# when using parallel-exec, because "run-sbcl-test-NNNN" randomly appears
# in either the SB-POSIX:READDIR call or CL:DIRECTORY but not both.
use_test_subdirectory_in_source_tree () { # DON'T USE THIS!
if test -d "$TEST_DIRECTORY"
then