CustomCommand.Key and CustomCommandMenuOption.Key are user-configured
keybindings just like the built-in ones. Converting them to the Keybinding type
lets a user assign multiple keys to the same custom command, e.g. `key: [a, b]`,
the same way they would for any other keybinding.
The validator iterates over the elements rather than checking a single string,
the binding registration goes through GetValidatedKeyBindingKeys to register
every alternate, and the existing error messages use .String() so a multi-key
binding renders sensibly.
CustomCommandPrompt.Key (a form field name, not a keybinding) stays a plain
string.
This is a pure refactor in preparation for letting users configure multiple
alternate bindings for a single command. Every Binding still has exactly one
key, so nothing changes visibly: the cheatsheet, the on-screen options bar,
and the keybindings menu all render identically.
When a Binding ends up with multiple keys, the on-screen options bar will
show only the first (to avoid clutter); the cheatsheet will show all of them (in
a later commit). For now both paths take Key[0].
MenuItem.Key is changed in the same way, it also has a slice of keys now.
In this commit we keep the name `Key` in Binding, KeybindingOpts and MenuItem,
instead of renaming them to `Keys` right away, in order to keep the diff a bit
more readable. We'll do the rename separately in the next commit.
Modifiers were moved into Key in 22169e22f, but the separate Modifier field
on types.Binding and gocui.keybinding was left behind. The keypress matcher
already compares modifiers via Key.Equals, so the old field is never read on
the dispatch path; it just got passed through SetKeybinding and stored.
Drop it from gocui.keybinding, types.Binding, and the SetKeybinding /
DeleteKeybinding signatures, and remove every now-redundant Modifier:
gocui.ModNone struct field. Mouse bindings keep their own Modifier (on
ViewMouseBinding) since that path still consults it.
I copied all files except dot files (.github and .gitignore), the _examples
folder, and go.mod/go.sum.
At some point we may want to copy the files back to the gocui repo when other
clients (e.g. lazydocker) want to use the newer versions of them.
We've been sometimes using lo and sometimes using my slices package, and we need to pick one
for consistency. Lo is more extensive and better maintained so we're going with that.
My slices package was a superset of go's own slices package so in some places I've just used
the official one (the methods were just wrappers anyway).
I've also moved the remaining methods into the utils package.
