`b` on a merge conflict is meant to keep both sides. With the diff3
conflict style git additionally renders the common ancestor between the
two sides, and the old ALL selection kept everything between the
outermost markers, dragging that ancestor into the resolved file.
Rename the selection from ALL to BOTH and restrict it to the top and
bottom hunks so the common base is dropped. Without the diff3 style
there is no ancestor section, so the behaviour there is unchanged.
The user-facing keybinding config was already named pickBothHunks; only
the internal enum, handler, translation and log string still said "all".
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
I took the set of enabled checks from revive's recommended configuration [1],
and removed some that I didn't like. There might be other useful checks in
revive that we might want to enable, but this is a nice improvement already.
The bulk of the changes here are removing unnecessary else statements after
returns, but there are a few others too.
[1] https://github.com/mgechev/revive?tab=readme-ov-file#recommended-configuration
In go 1.22, loop variables are redeclared with each iteration of the
loop, rather than simple updated on each iteration. This means that we
no longer need to manually redeclare variables when they're closed over
by a function.
We're not fully standardising here: different contexts can store their range state however
they like. What we are standardising on is that now the view is always responsible for
highlighting the selected lines, meaning the context/controller needs to tell the view
where the range start is.
Two convenient benefits from this change:
1) we no longer need bespoke code in integration tests for asserting on selected lines because
we can just ask the view
2) line selection in staging/patch-building/merge-conflicts views now look the same as in
list views i.e. the highlight applies to the whole line (including trailing space)
I also noticed a bug with merge conflicts not rendering the selection on focus though I suspect
it wasn't a bug with any real consequences when the view wasn't displaying the selection.
I'm going to scrap the selectedRangeBgColor config and just let it use the single line
background color. Hopefully nobody cares, but there's really no need for an extra config.
