Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Stefan Haller d181615c31 Make integration tests using commits more robust
Some tests assert that a specific commit subject does or doesn't occur
in the main view; interactive_rebase/outside_rebase_range_select.go is
an example for this, it asserts `t.Views().Main().Content(
DoesNotContain("commit 06"))`. The problem with this kind of assertion
and our test commit naming scheme is that the diff view begins with a
"commit <hash>" line, and when that hash happens to start with "06" the
assertion matched it and failed spuriously. This was usually masked by
our MaxAttempts=2 that we currently use for integration tests (it's
quite unlikely that the commit gets a hash beginning with "06" twice in
a row). However, we want to get to a state where we can set MaxAttempts
to 1, so make this more robust by changing our naming scheme.
2026-07-09 11:56:27 +02:00
Stefan Haller 74054c9d70 Remove the "YOU ARE HERE" marker
Now that we have sections, it is no longer needed.

Keep the "<-- CONFLICTS" marker though.
2025-04-20 16:06:15 +02:00
Stefan Haller 6cbc1e0ace Add section headers for rebase todos, cherry-picks, reverts, and actual commits 2025-04-20 16:06:15 +02:00
Stefan Haller 40232440b7 Support setting a range of commits to "edit" outside of a rebase
It starts a rebase on the bottom-most commit of the range, and sets all the
selected commits to "edit" (skipping merge commits, because they can't be
edited).
2024-03-09 07:43:48 +01:00
Jesse Duffield f0de880136 Support range select in rebase actions 2024-01-23 17:23:56 +11:00