The focused main view's click/enter/e/G handlers all need the same thing: given
a rendered diff row, the patch-space line it corresponds to. Until now that came
solely from delta's lazygit-edit:// hyperlinks, which only carry a path and a
single line number — no side. That's lossy: for a deletion the number is the old
line, but the consumers fed it into new-file lookups, and two consecutive
deletions (which share a new-file line number) couldn't be told apart at all.
Replace GetFileAndLineForClickedDiffLine with GetDiffLineInfo, returning the
fuller (file, type, new-line, old-line) record from diff-line-metadata-notes.md.
This is mechanism #1: parse the decolorized view buffer — walk up to the file's
"diff --git" section, reuse patch.Parse on it (splitting multi-file commit diffs
on the "diff --git" boundaries), and read the type and line numbers off the patch
arithmetic. It serves the structure-preserving renderings — no pager, git diff
--color, and delta --color-only without line numbers — with no external
dependency.
To avoid trusting a mis-parse, the parser bails when a hunk's body no longer
matches its header (Patch.IsWellFormed). That's what happens when a pager keeps
the diff/hunk headers but restructures the body: delta's line-number gutters push
the +/- marker off the start of each line, so every body line reads as context.
Such renderings fall through to the next backend rather than yielding a confident
wrong answer. (diff-so-fancy goes further and rewrites the headers too, so it
fails even earlier, on the missing "diff --git".)
GetDiffLineInfo is a seam with swappable backends: the buffer parser first, then
the old hyperlink reader as a fallback for renderings the parser can't handle
(delta's default mode, or delta with line-number gutters). The future #2 OSC
per-cell metadata reader plugs in ahead of both, behind the same record shape.
Wire the consumers to the record per that doc's field mapping:
- dive into staging/patch building lands on the exact patch line, looking a
deletion up by its old-file line number (PatchLineForOldLineNumber) so the
two-deletions case resolves correctly;
- `e` edits at the new-file line;
- `G` anchors the PR link on the left (old) side for a deletion, the right (new)
side otherwise.
The hyperlink fallback can't convey the side, so it reports DiffLineOther, which
the consumers treat as a non-deletion — i.e. exactly today's behavior.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The patch package can already map a patch line index to its new-file line
number and back (LineNumberOfLine / PatchLineForLineNumber). The diff-line
parser being built on top of this needs the old-file equivalents: a deletion
has no distinct new-file position (two consecutive deletions share one), so to
land on the exact deletion when diving into staging we have to look it up by
old-file line number.
Add OldLineNumberOfLine and PatchLineForOldLineNumber as direct mirrors of the
new-file functions, counting DELETION+CONTEXT lines instead of ADDITION+CONTEXT.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
When loading the files of a commit we passed --no-renames, so a rename
showed up as a separate delete and add rather than a single R entry.
That made it impossible to work with a rename that also modifies the
file: the modifications were spread across a full deletion and a full
addition instead of appearing as the handful of lines that actually
changed. The staging view already shows renames and lets you stage
their hunks, so there was no good reason for the patch builder to
differ; the flag was only there because the commit-file parser couldn't
cope with the rename record format.
Switch the commit-file loader and the per-file diff to --find-renames,
teach the parser about the rename record (a status followed by two
paths), and carry the previous path through the patch builder so the
diff for a rename is loaded with both paths, which is what makes git
emit the rename in the first place.
A whole-file selection keeps the rename in the header, so the rename
moves or is discarded together with the file's contents. A partial
selection instead strips the rename metadata and points the header at
the new path, so applying the patch only changes the contents and
leaves the rename in place; the blob index line is kept so that a 3-way
apply can still fall back to a blob merge.
Discarding a renamed file from a commit now discards both the new and
the old path, so the new file is removed and the old one is restored.
Changing the rename similarity threshold refreshes the commit files
panel too, not just the files panel, so that a rename can turn into a
delete and add or back. It is disabled while building a patch, however,
because the patch builder caches each file's diff by path and would
desync if a rename changed into a delete and add underneath it.
Finally, copying a file's diff from the commit files panel now passes
both paths for a rename, so the copied diff shows the rename instead of
a new-file add.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This fixes the problem; a consequence of this change is that given the following
scenario:
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
1
-2
+2b
3
staging only the line `+2b` will put it *before* the unchanged `2` line, rather
than after it as you might expect (the changed unit tests demonstrate this).
Since this should be a pretty uncommon scenario, I guess it is an ok compromise.
As you can see in the changed tests, while the behavior of what gets staged is
fixed now, it doesn't always correctly select the next line to stage. We'll
address this in the next commit.
When entering staging (or patch building) for an added or deleted file, it
doesn't make sense to use hunk mode, because pressing space would stage/unstage
the entire file, and if the user wanted to do that, they would have pressed
space in the Files panel. So always use line mode for added/deleted files by
default, even if the useHunkModeInStagingView user config is on.
Not because it's terribly important to test here (doesn't hurt though), but
because it will be useful in the next commit for a new test we're adding there.
There are two ways to jump to the editor on a specific line: pressing `e` in the
staging or patch building panels, or clicking on a hyperlink in a delta diff. In
both cases, this works perfectly in the unstaged changes view, but in other
views (either staged changes, or an older commit) it can often jump to the wrong
line; this happens when there are further changes to the file being viewed in
later commits or in unstaged changes.
This commit fixes this so that you end up on the right line in these cases.
In go 1.22, loop variables are redeclared with each iteration of the
loop, rather than simple updated on each iteration. This means that we
no longer need to manually redeclare variables when they're closed over
by a function.
There's a bug in LineNumberOfLine, but the existing test coverage doesn't catch
it, as the only test case for this was one where oldStart and newStart were the
same for all hunks. Add a test case where newStart is different for one of the
hunks; this demonstrates a bug, where all expected results from index 12 on are
off by one.
